Migrants' Home Town Associations and Local Development in Mali

Date01 April 2015
AuthorMarion Mercier,Flore Gubert,Sandrine Mesplé‐Somps,Lisa Chauvet
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12100
Published date01 April 2015
Scand. J. of Economics 117(2), 686–722, 2015
DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12100
Migrants’ Home Town Associations and
Local Development in Mali
Lisa Chauvet
IRD, UMR DIAL; PSL, Paris-Dauphine University, FR-75010 Paris, France
chauvet@dial.prd.fr
Flore Gubert
IRD, UMR DIAL; PSL, Paris-Dauphine University, FR-75010 Paris, France
gubert@dial.prd.fr
Marion Mercier
Paris School of Economics, FR-75014 Paris, France
mercier@dial.prd.fr
Sandrine Mespl´
e-Somps
IRD, UMR DIAL; PSL, Paris-Dauphine University, FR-75010 Paris, France
mesple@dial.prd.fr
Abstract
We explore the impact of migrants’ Home Town Associations (HTAs) on the provision of
public goods in Mali. We combine an original dataset on all the HTAs created by Malian
migrants in France from 1981 with census data on public goods in all Malian villages since
1976, and we run double-difference estimations to compare villages with and without an
HTA, before and after the creation of the HTAs. We find robust evidence that the provision
of schools, health centers, and, to a lesser extent, water amenities has increased significantly
faster in villages targeted by an HTA between 1987 and 2009 than in control villages.
Keywords: Home Town Associations; Mali; migration; public goods
JEL classification:F22; H41; H75; O55
I. Introduction
Recent years have witnessed a growing interest from scholars, development
practitioners, and international organizations in the relationship between
migration and development. In particular, academic research has focused
This research has been supported by “FSP Mali contemporain”, Paris municipality, the
French National Research Agency, and the European FP7 (program NOPOOR). We thank
Claire Bernard, Mahamadou Dangnoko, Anda David, and Nelly Rakoto-Tiana for their help
during the data collection, and we are grateful to the Malian statistical office for providing
census data. We also thank the editor and twoanonymous referees for very helpful comments.
CThe editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2014.
L. Chauvet et al. 687
strongly on the impact of remittances on origin countries, notably on ag-
gregate development outcomes, such as poverty and growth, and on the
behavior of recipient households. External remittances have become an in-
creasingly substantial source of financial flows for developing countries,
and have outstripped private capital flows and official development aid
in many of them. In 2011, remittances were the second largest source of
external finance to developing countries as a whole (370 billion dollars)
behind foreign direct investment (around 500 billion dollars). They were
nearly three times larger than official development assistance (around 140
billion dollars) (Ratha and Silwal, 2012).
In addition to sending remittances to their family, migrants frequently
contribute to the development of their village of origin by sending collec-
tive transfers through Home Town Associations (HTAs). HTAs are volun-
tary clubs located in immigrants’ host societies, gathering migrants from
the same locality of origin. One of their goals is to fund local develop-
ment projects, and as such they have received increased attention from the
development community, which considers them to be potential participants
in the process of leveraging funds for investment and development in the
resource-poor communities of origin. There are good reasons to be opti-
mistic about the role of HTAs in development. In the context of weak states
with low fiscal capacity, HTAs and collective remittances can complement
scarce public resources and relieve binding budget constraints. Thus, the
population of the locality of origin where HTAs intervene might end up
better off.
Yet, the question of the real impact of HTAs on local development is
not straightforward from a theoretical perspective. First, instead of comple-
menting public resources, collective remittances might actually substitute
for them and crowd out public finance. Indeed, by relaxing important bottle-
necks, they might create a disincentive for the state and local governments
to intervene, which might result in lower public spending (Grabel, 2008).
In other words, the activity of HTAs might allow local governments to ex-
tricate themselves from their responsibilities, leaving the targeted localities
worse off in terms of public goods. Second, HTAs might not be as effective
as public actors in terms of development objectives. Indeed, the impact of
the activity of HTAs depends on how projects are conceived and selected,
and on how transparent and inclusive the decision-making processes are.
When projects are designed by HTA members from abroad, with little or
no input from their potential beneficiaries, they might be ill-conceived,
might not meet the needs of home communities, and thus might be quickly
abandoned. Third, when the migration process is selective and mainly in-
volves certain groups, the HTA projects might serve private agendas rather
than addressing larger community needs. Thus, their benefits might be
narrowly distributed and might aggravate social divides in the community.
CThe editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2014.
688 Migrants’ HTAs and local development in Mali
In this scenario, HTAs might contribute to the erosion of social cohesion
within local communities, thereby altering their capacity to agree upon and
implement collective action, which ultimately has detrimental effects on
sustained local development.
In the case of Mali, a few small-scale case studies focusing on the
Kayes area, in the western part of the country, describe migrants’ HTAs
as a substantial source of funding, and document the number and type
of development projects they have financed.1However, the contribution
of HTAs at the national level has never been systematically investigated,
and there is no quantitative evidence as to whether their activity makes
the villages of origin better off in terms of local public goods than those
villages with no HTA.
This lack of evidence on the net impact of HTAs on local development is
not restricted to Mali, and the literature provides very little quantitative evi-
dence on collective remittances. Two major exceptions are Beauchemin and
Schoumaker (2009) on Burkina Faso and Kijima and Gonzalez-Ramirez
(2012) on the Mexican Tres por Uno (3×1) program. In the Burkina
Faso case study, Beauchemin and Schoumaker exploit retrospective data
covering the 1960–2002 period on a sample of 600 settlements, and use
event-history models to test whether the existence of a migrant associa-
tion2has an influence on the provision of public services, on agricultural
modernization, and on the availability of infrastructures. They find a pos-
itive and significant effect of HTAs on the provision of social services
and roads, with some differences in magnitude from one decade to the
other. Kijima and Gonzalez-Ramirez (2012) document the Mexican (3 ×1)
program, which supports HTA involvement in the development of origin
communities by providing complementary funding through municipal, state,
and federal contributions. Focusing on two states of Mexico (i.e., Jalisco
and Zacatecas3), the authors observe that recipient communities became
better off between 2000 and 2005, as attested by decreasing scores of de-
privation. In this particular case, it is argued that roads, water supply, and
non-agricultural productive projects funded by the (3 ×1) program have
improved community welfare.
1The pioneering research on this topic was carried out in the 1990s (e.g., Quiminal, 1991;
Daum, 1998). Gauvrit and Le Bahers (2004) have provided an inventory of development
projects financed by HTAs in 51 Malian localities in the Kayes region, whereas Charef and
Gonin (2005) have undertaken several case studies at the locality level, all of them in the
Kayes region.
2Contrary to other West African countries such as Mali, most HTAs in Burkina Faso have
been created by internal migrants.
3Those two states have been chosen because they have received the higher amounts of the
budget of the program.
CThe editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2014.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT