Do Parental Networks Pay Off? Linking Children's Labor‐Market Outcomes to Their Parents' Friends

AuthorErik Plug,Bas Klaauw,Lennart Ziegler
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12227
Date01 January 2018
Published date01 January 2018
©The editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2017.
Scand. J. of Economics 120(1), 268–295, 2018
DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12227
Do Parental Networks Pay Off? Linking
Children’s Labor-Market Outcomes to Their
Parents’Friends*
Erik Plug
University of Amsterdam, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
e.j.s.plug@uva.nl
Bas van der Klaauw
VU University Amsterdam, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
b.vander.klaauw@vu.nl
Lennart Ziegler
University of Vienna, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
lennart.ziegler@univie.ac.at
Abstract
In this paper, we examine whether children are better off if their parents have more
elaborate social networks. Using data on high-school friendships of parents, we analyze
whether the number and characteristics of friends affect the labor-market outcomes of
children. While parental friendships formed in high school appear long lasting, we find no
significant impact on their children’s occupational choices and earnings prospects. These
results do not change when we account for network endogeneity, network persistency,
and network measurement error. Only when children enter the labor market do friends
of parents have a marginally significant but small influence on their occupational choice.
Keywords: Informal job search; intergenerational effects; occupational choice;
social networks
JEL classification:A14; J24; J46; J62
I. Introduction
Social networks are widely considered important for labor-market outcomes
(Jackson, 2010). In search models, social networks are typically thought
of as informal job-search channels providing job searchers with either
information about open vacancies or background references,
*This research uses the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) of the University of Wisconsin-
Madison. The WLS has been supported principally by the National Institute on Aging. We
thank seminar and conference participants in Amsterdam, Braga, and Ljubljana, as well as
two anonymous referees, for their comments and suggestions.
E. Plug, B. van der Klaauw, and L. Ziegler 269
recommendations and job referrals (Rees, 1966; Granovetter, 1973).
Furthermore, in surveys, social networks are often mentioned as one of
the main channels through which job searchers find jobs (Holzer, 1987,
1988; Ioannides and Loury, 2004; Cappellari and Tatsiramos, 2015).
However, quantifying social networks and their impact on labor-market
success has proved difficult. First, social networks are often loosely defined
and can take many shapes and forms, ranging from family members and
friends to colleagues, dormmates, neighbors, and ethnic-minority groups.1
Second, information on social networks is rarely collected together with
information on labor-market outcomes. Third, causal inference is difficult
due to the potential endogeneity of network connections (Manski, 1993;
Bramoull´e et al., 2009).
In this paper, we are the first to examine whether children are better off
if their parents have more elaborate social networks. Specifically, we focus
on the high-school friendships of parents and test whether the number and
characteristics of high-school friends affect the labor-market outcomes of
children. Our empirical strategy takes into account some of the selectivity
effects that are common to studies on the labor-market consequences of
social networks. In particular, we examine how sensitive our results are to
network measurement error, network persistency, and network endogeneity.
We use data from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS). The WLS
contains detailed information on a random sample of Wisconsin high-
school graduates in 1957 (Hauser, 2009 provides an overview of the
WLS structure). Respondents are asked about their friendship connections
in high school, which can be used to reconstruct the underlying friendship
network. Respondents also report their children’s occupational choice,
which we measure in terms of prospective earnings and interpret as
a proxy for lifetime earnings. We exploit the richness of the WLS,
including information on the respondents’ cognitive and non-cognitive
abilities, educational attainment and other socioeconomic variables, to
account for many of the individual characteristics that possibly confound
friendship ties. The WLS information on friendship ties has been used
before by Conti et al. (2013).
We start our empirical analysis by examining whether children, parents,
and high-school friends of parents make similar occupational choices. We
do not find evidence for the presence of friendship-network effects. We find
positive correlations between the occupations of children and the friends
of their parents, but these positive correlations disappear as soon as we
account for coinciding occupational choices between parents and children.
1Examples are Kramarz and Nordstr¨om Skans (2014), Cappellari and Tatsiramos (2015),
Cingano and Rosolia (2012), Marmaros and Sacerdote (2006), Topa (2001), and Edin et al.
(2003).
©The editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2017.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT