Revisiting the Relationship between Ethnic Diversity and Preferences for Redistribution: Reply
Author | Matz Dahlberg,Heléne Berg,Karin Edmark |
Date | 01 April 2017 |
DOI | http://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12210 |
Published date | 01 April 2017 |
Scand. J. of Economics 119(2), 288–294, 2017
DOI: 10.1111/sjoe.12210
Revisiting the Relationship between Ethnic
Diversity and Preferences
for Redistribution: Reply∗
Matz Dahlberg
Uppsala University, SE-751 05, Uppsala, Sweden
matz.dahlberg@ibf.uu.se
Karin Edmark
Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
karin.edmark@sofi.su.se
Hel´
ene Berg†
Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
helene.berg@ne.su.se
Abstract
Here, we respond to the comments raised by Nekby and Pettersson-Lidbom on our paper
Dahlberg et al. (2012, Journal of Political Economy 120, 41–76). We argue that our estimates
are internally valid, but we acknowledge that the external validity could have been discussed
more thoroughly.
Keywords: Ethnic heterogeneity; immigration; income redistribution
JEL classification:D31; D64; Z13
I. Introduction
In this issue of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Nekby and
Pettersson-Lidbom comment on Dahlberg et al. (2012).1We welcome this
discussion, and in this reply we briefly respond to three of the issues raised:
possible measures of preferences for redistribution, sample selection bias,
and the use of the refugee placement policy as an instrument for immi-
gration. Lengthier responses to these issues, and also responses to some
∗We thank Per Johansson as well as participants at the Political Economy Workshop held
in Oslo in December 2012 for insightful comments. K. Edmark and H. Berg are grateful
for financial support from the Jan Wallander and Tom Hedelius foundation. The authors are
listed in the original alphabetic order and this does not indicate a degree of contribution.
†Previously Hel´
ene Lundqvist.
1Hereafter, we refer to the comment by Nekby and Pettersson-Lidbom as NP-L, and we
refer to the article by Dahlberg et al. (2012) as DEL.
CThe editors of The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2016.
To continue reading
Request your trial